Experience makes us see the importance of seeking standardized protocols in the treatment and daily maintenance of people in mental health programs. Research, case studies, and other evidence signal that the world tends to produce knowledge multilaterally. Various countries can contribute to more effective and practical management strategies, ultimately improving the quality of life and the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches.
In several regions of the world, mental health treatment is conceptualized based on the disease model. However, this approach is outdated. Today, we need more active participation from patients rather than passive treatment under traditional disease models.
The patient is the protagonist and must be humanized and engaged in their treatment. For example, in the United States, the conservative disease-based approach has been gradually replaced by a mental health promotion narrative. Patients receive multidisciplinary assistance, leading to greater stabilization and improved overall well-being.
A successful international case could be replicated if there were an established international platform for discussion on this topic. I propose a new, transparent system aligned with international humanitarian principles. My theory suggests that nations create an academic database where all research, case studies, and clinical notes from academic and medical institutions are systematically recorded. This database would serve as a resource for countries facing mental health challenges, equipping them with the necessary knowledge to implement effective solutions.
The development, dissemination, and implementation of this database must align with human rights principles. As information begins to be shared globally, it must retain a privileged status that adheres to international norms and ethical standards.
Once ratified under a Human Rights Treaty, nations contributing to this effort, such as signatories of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, would receive a structured and urgent approach to mental health issues. The very essence of this initiative falls under humanitarian law, as the right to health is a fundamental component of the right to life—a key concern for human rights advocates.
In this initial phase, the agreement’s acceptance and ratification would be voluntary, serving primarily as an academic and research-based initiative. Although not legally binding, the data collected could inform future policy and guide health professionals worldwide in their therapeutic approaches.
Beyond medical applications, I propose that this mental health information center extend its guidance to public security professionals and other state agents who interact directly with the public. Effective training in mental health crisis intervention for law enforcement and emergency responders would prevent unnecessary harm and ensure that individuals in crisis receive appropriate medical attention instead of punitive measures.
Moreover, modern technology should be leveraged as a powerful tool for knowledge dissemination. Social networks, digital platforms, and specialized software can facilitate a virtual learning environment that enables training, lectures, workshops, and international knowledge-sharing. This approach would create a large, multidisciplinary, and integrative workforce capable of delivering informed and humane care.
In a structured and human rights-oriented manner, establishing a global advisory database with tiered access based on user roles would ensure professionalism in data management while adhering to international security and data protection standards.
I conclude with the assertion that physical borders should be considered only for geopolitical purposes. Mental health policies should transcend national boundaries when human rights are at stake. There can be no border that takes precedence over the fundamental right to health and well-being.
For humanitarian protection, we must recognize that we are all human beings deserving of care, regardless of nationality. A global mental health initiative rooted in shared knowledge and cooperation is not just a possibility—it is a necessity.
0 thoughts on “Establishing the 1st International Treaty for Rights and Duties in Mental Health”
Pingback: Reflecting on a Career in Therapy After Schizophrenia – Mental Health Affairs