The Dual Facets of J. Peters’ Literary Pursuits: Unveiling the Complex Landscape of Mental Health and Personal Catharsis

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

J. Peters, a Licensed Clinical Social Worker, therapist, and writer, is a force to be reckoned with in the mental health sphere. Based in New York, Peters juggles his professional commitments and his personal quest to understand the intricate maze of mental health through his writings. With two books, ‘University on Watch’ and ‘Small Fingernails,‘ he focuses on the hazy, often misunderstood, line between personal experiences and professional wisdom. But what really goes into crafting these polarizing works? Is it ethics, revenge, catharsis, or an amalgamation of all these elements? We delve into the man’s mind through an incisive interview and examine why his works are of utmost relevance today—both as contributions to mental health literature and as subjects of debate.


While both books bear Peters’ distinct style and penetrating insight into human psychology, they cater to different audiences and serve unique purposes. ‘University on Watch’ resonates with the mental health community and literary circles for its daring exposition of systemic flaws in academia and healthcare. On the other hand, ‘Small Fingernails’ is a private affair—a settling of old scores with friends from his college days at New London University.

When asked about these stark differences during an interview, Peters cryptically responded, “These two books couldn’t be more different, and yet, in the end, they are the same book.”

The statement leaves us pondering. Despite their apparent differences, could both books serve the same ultimate purpose for Peters—emotional release and public engagement in a dialogue about mental health?


Where ‘University on Watch’ aims to illuminate, ‘Small Fingernails’ seems to incinerate. Peters doesn’t mince words when explaining his intention behind the latter: “Vengeance. This is my V-book, or ‘Vengeance Book.'”

His candid revelation about seeking retribution raises questions of ethics. While the book allowed Peters to discharge pent-up emotions, it begs the question—where do we draw the line between personal catharsis and ethical responsibility, especially when one is a licensed mental health professional?

Peters isn’t oblivious to these ethical entanglements. In his words, “Small Fingernails was just an exercise in the politics of friendship in the wake of unrequited love. The challenge wasn’t writing the book. The challenge was living out its pages years ago and living to write about it years later.”


As a social worker and therapist, Peters brings a unique ethical dimension to his writings. He operates at the intersection of professional conduct and personal freedom—two realms often at odds with one another. While ‘University on Watch’ adheres closely to the ethical line, highlighting systemic issues in mental health treatment, ‘Small Fingernails’ seems to blur it intentionally.

For mental health professionals reading Peters’ work, the ethical considerations are palpable. How can a professional dedicated to healing also express such a strong desire for personal revenge? And does the act of writing serve as a form of therapy for the author, a cathartic release that is perhaps ethically dubious but psychologically essential?


Peters’ complex moral landscape calls attention to the responsibilities of any writer, not just those in the mental health field. All writers must balance their own need for expression against the potential consequences their words may have on others. This balance is even more precarious when the writer has a professional standing in a field closely related to the subject matter.

The controversy around ‘Small Fingernails’ is precisely what makes it a significant contribution to the discourse around mental health and ethics. It sparks dialogue about the intersectionality between personal and professional realms—a debate that is long overdue.


Despite the polarizing nature of his work, Peters believes his books act as a “mirror” to society. Whether it’s through the revengeful pages of ‘Small Fingernails’ or the eye-opening narratives in ‘University on Watch,’ he aims to incite readers to reflect on their attitudes towards mental health, friendship, and ethical conduct.

“I wanted the audience, my readers, to laugh in the faces of so many of the characters in the book,” says Peters about ‘Small Fingernails.’ Is this not, in a way, a societal critique? By portraying real people as caricatures, Peters makes us question the judgments we make about others—perhaps even pushing us to introspection.


J. Peters’ writings are a rollercoaster ride through the human psyche and are as confrontational as they are revealing. While ‘University on Watch’ gives us an understanding of the systemic flaws in addressing mental health, ‘Small Fingernails’ gives us an unforgiving look at the interpersonal dynamics that often shape our emotional well-being.

The body of work left behind by Peters is not just a contribution to mental health literature but also a provocation—a challenge to our preconceived notions. As he himself said, “Dialogue, even if it stems from controversy, is better than the silence that often surrounds these complicated emotions and events.”

In the end, the pertinence of Peters’ works lies not just in the narratives themselves but in the conversations they evoke. And it’s these conversations that will define the future trajectory of mental health discourse, raising questions that we, as a society, must be brave enough to ask.


By setting the stage for these vital discussions, J. Peters ensures his legacy will be one of complexity, controversy, and invaluable contribution to our understanding of mental health. So, as readers, practitioners, or mere observers, it’s our turn to engage. The question is, are we ready?

Author Info:

Max E. Guttman
Mindful Living LCSW | 914 400 7566 | maxwellguttman@gmail.com | Website |  + posts

Max E. Guttman is the owner of Mindful Living LCSW, PLLC, a private mental health practice in Yonkers, New York.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Advertisement

Text, call, or chat with 988 to speak with the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.

Help is available 24/7

Empowering Recovery: Mental HEALTH AFFAIRS BLOG

In a world filled with noise, where discussions on mental health are often either stigmatised or oversimplified, one blog has managed to carve out a space for authentic, in-depth conversations: Mental Health Affairs. Founded by Max E. Guttman, LCSW, the blog has become a sanctuary for those seeking understanding, clarity, and real talk about the complexities of mental health—both in personal experiences and in larger societal contexts.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Curated Post Updates!

Sign up for my newsletter to see new photos, tips, and blog posts.